<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:39:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Vincente Minnelli biog by eitherorbored</title>
		<link>http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/vincent-minelli-biog/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>eitherorbored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/?p=554#comment-176</guid>
		<description>dang, forgot to tell wordpress to let me know of any follow up comments. Had absolutely no idea about that upcoming Pixar project. Live action you say? That&#039;s interesting. I wonder why they chose not to animate it? Brand segmentation I guess. Pixar are pretty astounding in their reputation for story and character and they consistantly blow their competition away. I just hope they can transfer those skills into live action, there&#039;s no reason they shouldn&#039;t be able to. I&#039;ll have to make a note to look it up as well as a note about that book of which you speak.

Sometimes I wonder. Is it because it&#039;s &#039;difficult&#039; to transfer the crux of the stories to the screen or is it simply that it is difficult to do it in a cookie cutter fashion? An adaptation should be more than just turning the book into a script it should also be about reforming the narrative and diesis into a shape that is suitable for the cinematic form, to approach the work in a new way. If i was ever going to adapt a novel i&#039;d written into a screenplay that is definately the approach i&#039;d take. It&#039;s definately something i&#039;ve pondered.

Still, perhaps i am expecting too much from such a generally artistically bankrupt institution as Hollywood. 

Obviously, the arguement is more complicated than that. The hollywood system has created many a fine piece of art masquarading as simple entertainment. But, for the sake of this arguement, let&#039;s say it&#039;s not. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dang, forgot to tell wordpress to let me know of any follow up comments. Had absolutely no idea about that upcoming Pixar project. Live action you say? That&#8217;s interesting. I wonder why they chose not to animate it? Brand segmentation I guess. Pixar are pretty astounding in their reputation for story and character and they consistantly blow their competition away. I just hope they can transfer those skills into live action, there&#8217;s no reason they shouldn&#8217;t be able to. I&#8217;ll have to make a note to look it up as well as a note about that book of which you speak.</p>
<p>Sometimes I wonder. Is it because it&#8217;s &#8216;difficult&#8217; to transfer the crux of the stories to the screen or is it simply that it is difficult to do it in a cookie cutter fashion? An adaptation should be more than just turning the book into a script it should also be about reforming the narrative and diesis into a shape that is suitable for the cinematic form, to approach the work in a new way. If i was ever going to adapt a novel i&#8217;d written into a screenplay that is definately the approach i&#8217;d take. It&#8217;s definately something i&#8217;ve pondered.</p>
<p>Still, perhaps i am expecting too much from such a generally artistically bankrupt institution as Hollywood. </p>
<p>Obviously, the arguement is more complicated than that. The hollywood system has created many a fine piece of art masquarading as simple entertainment. But, for the sake of this arguement, let&#8217;s say it&#8217;s not. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vincente Minnelli biog by joolsayodeji</title>
		<link>http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/vincent-minelli-biog/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>joolsayodeji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/?p=554#comment-175</guid>
		<description>I agree, with what you say and that it sucks. The interesting thing about this book were the films that actually qualify under the &#039;never made&#039; title. Those ones that actually still havent been made. Unlike I am Legend, various Star Treks, Hitchhikers Guide, etc all of which feature in the book and where the released film is actually reviewed. The actual  &#039;yet to be made&#039; films intended to do what I think is the most interesting thing about SciFi in that they were full of ideas. Cerebral, conceptual, intellectual and thus much more difficult to adapt into the normative two-hour max narrative structure model of most films. I wonder what Pixar&#039;s live action John Carter of Mars adaptation will be like? A friend of mine who works af Framestore (London) was talking about Double Negative who are doing the post-production for the film (300 people hired recently) . I don&#039;t know if the film is based on that particular book or is an amalgam of the series of books. Pixar clearly have a good reputation for their approach to story and script so we&#039;ll wait and see. 2012 I think it is due.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, with what you say and that it sucks. The interesting thing about this book were the films that actually qualify under the &#8216;never made&#8217; title. Those ones that actually still havent been made. Unlike I am Legend, various Star Treks, Hitchhikers Guide, etc all of which feature in the book and where the released film is actually reviewed. The actual  &#8216;yet to be made&#8217; films intended to do what I think is the most interesting thing about SciFi in that they were full of ideas. Cerebral, conceptual, intellectual and thus much more difficult to adapt into the normative two-hour max narrative structure model of most films. I wonder what Pixar&#8217;s live action John Carter of Mars adaptation will be like? A friend of mine who works af Framestore (London) was talking about Double Negative who are doing the post-production for the film (300 people hired recently) . I don&#8217;t know if the film is based on that particular book or is an amalgam of the series of books. Pixar clearly have a good reputation for their approach to story and script so we&#8217;ll wait and see. 2012 I think it is due.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vincente Minnelli biog by eitherorbored</title>
		<link>http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/vincent-minelli-biog/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>eitherorbored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/?p=554#comment-174</guid>
		<description>I think SciFi cinema has always existed in a sort of genre ghetto. I mean there are clever, well made science fiction movies but you can count them on your digits, especially if your talking about hollywood output. Usual scifi fare consists of films with other genre elements (like action, horror, disaster etc.) welded on. 

I think television scifi has developed a little better recently but even the best of recent years, and I&#039;m going to go with Battlestar Galactica for its poignant representation of the human condition, was a remake of a show from the 70s. Even the latest series of torchwood, which definately had its moments, only came about off the back of another series, hit a stride two series into the show and was hacked to death by the BBC for good or ill.

I guess it comes down to the geek stigma of scifi as it exists in the collective mind of popular culture. People can&#039;t help but think of it in terms of sad little virgin nerds quoting star trek at each other on forums. Of course, this is a poor stereotype that only represents geek culture in the most marginal of senses but as an archetypal image it is writ large in the collective unconscious. 

Which, frankly, sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think SciFi cinema has always existed in a sort of genre ghetto. I mean there are clever, well made science fiction movies but you can count them on your digits, especially if your talking about hollywood output. Usual scifi fare consists of films with other genre elements (like action, horror, disaster etc.) welded on. </p>
<p>I think television scifi has developed a little better recently but even the best of recent years, and I&#8217;m going to go with Battlestar Galactica for its poignant representation of the human condition, was a remake of a show from the 70s. Even the latest series of torchwood, which definately had its moments, only came about off the back of another series, hit a stride two series into the show and was hacked to death by the BBC for good or ill.</p>
<p>I guess it comes down to the geek stigma of scifi as it exists in the collective mind of popular culture. People can&#8217;t help but think of it in terms of sad little virgin nerds quoting star trek at each other on forums. Of course, this is a poor stereotype that only represents geek culture in the most marginal of senses but as an archetypal image it is writ large in the collective unconscious. </p>
<p>Which, frankly, sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Radio interview by Kate Chapman</title>
		<link>http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2009/09/20/radio-interview/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2009/09/20/radio-interview/#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Thanks for mentioning TWP Jules!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for mentioning TWP Jules!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fela&#8217;s wives by Bianca</title>
		<link>http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/felas-wives-3/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Bianca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/felas-wives-3/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Hi Jools

Just a quick comment to clarify: you read the programme right - we are keeping Writers&#039; Lab separate on the Tuesday evening, and I expect it to be a similar length to our sharing in July. The Monday night will be dedicated to your Fela play, supported by live, specially programmed African music. There will be the opportunity to present more than a twenty minute extract, but the whole things is about what you will find useful, so keep talking to Kate.

As for marriage, I&#039;m always surprised by the way expectations change over time. My marriage seems a very different thing to how it started. I suppose it&#039;s inevitable that both parties will change and you have to find your own way to come to terms with that. It&#039;s impossible to foresee what will happen and how people will change, so I think the only way to be happy is to embrace all the changes that have happened, as well as those that will. The negotiations in a marriage contract never end!

Really looking forward to reading draft two!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jools</p>
<p>Just a quick comment to clarify: you read the programme right &#8211; we are keeping Writers&#8217; Lab separate on the Tuesday evening, and I expect it to be a similar length to our sharing in July. The Monday night will be dedicated to your Fela play, supported by live, specially programmed African music. There will be the opportunity to present more than a twenty minute extract, but the whole things is about what you will find useful, so keep talking to Kate.</p>
<p>As for marriage, I&#8217;m always surprised by the way expectations change over time. My marriage seems a very different thing to how it started. I suppose it&#8217;s inevitable that both parties will change and you have to find your own way to come to terms with that. It&#8217;s impossible to foresee what will happen and how people will change, so I think the only way to be happy is to embrace all the changes that have happened, as well as those that will. The negotiations in a marriage contract never end!</p>
<p>Really looking forward to reading draft two!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Celtx Pre-production software by Hitesh</title>
		<link>http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/celtx-pre-production-software/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Hitesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/celtx-pre-production-software/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Amazing free open source, i began to use it the minute i discovered it. I agree with you Jools on how easy it actully is to switch the style of your script to another format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing free open source, i began to use it the minute i discovered it. I agree with you Jools on how easy it actully is to switch the style of your script to another format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rural Touring Project by sandysays1</title>
		<link>http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2009/01/28/rural-touring-project/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>sandysays1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/?p=310#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Lots depends on who your cohabitating with on that boat.  Sometime 2 weeks can be 2 seconds or two decades depending on that.   One dog&#039;s opinion-  Visit me at  www.SandySays1.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots depends on who your cohabitating with on that boat.  Sometime 2 weeks can be 2 seconds or two decades depending on that.   One dog&#8217;s opinion-  Visit me at  <a href="http://www.SandySays1.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.SandySays1.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stanley Kubrick Archive by Tom Robinson</title>
		<link>http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/stanley-kubrick-archive/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/?p=285#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Sounds superb. There was a documentary about this on tv a couple of months back, thousands of reference photos for a single doorway scene in Eyes Wide Shut among other things. Should be a good trip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds superb. There was a documentary about this on tv a couple of months back, thousands of reference photos for a single doorway scene in Eyes Wide Shut among other things. Should be a good trip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on books by randy</title>
		<link>http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/books/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/books/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Lots to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 24 Degrees. Draft 1 finished by Justin</title>
		<link>http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/2008/12/03/24-degrees-draft-1-finished/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joolsayodeji.wordpress.com/?p=244#comment-131</guid>
		<description>GOOD LUCK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOOD LUCK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
